|
Join
the Ordinance Development
E-Mail
Community ...
CLICK HERE
DRAFT
ZONING AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
Printable (PDF)
Table of Contents
Draft Ordinance
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Current Zoning & Subdivision Ordinance
County Home
Development Meeting Minutes
September 10
September 18 |
Development Meeting Schedule
Please
check this site before attending for cancellations and latest updates!
|
County Commissioners have
postponed the Monday, December 15, review to allow attendance by
county counsel. No new date has yet been set. |
|
Special Meeting: Wednesday, January 7, 5:30 p.m., Main
Courtroom
-
Continuation
of public hearing, 08-160, Fra. Gregory Horton
-
Zone
Ordinance Review
-
Adjourn 8:30
p.m.
Regular Meeting, Thursday, January 15, 5:30 p.m., Main
Courtroom
Agenda Tentative
-
Reading/approval November minutes
-
Election of
officers
-
Zone
Ordinance Review
-
Adjourn
Special Meeting, Wednesday, January 28, 5:30 p.m., Main
Courtroom
-
Zone
Ordinance Review
-
Adjourn 8:30 p.m.
|
Last Development Meeting
Boundary County Planning and Zoning
MINUTES
Special
Meeting, November 5, 2008
Members present: Jake Negley, Tom Hollingsworth,
Matt Morgan, Henry McMahon, Doug Reoch. Members absent: Jan Christenson
(called), Rod Barcklay (called), Barry Davis, Bruce Behrman. Staff
present: Mike Weland
- Hollingsworth opened the meeting at 5:30, and
members reviewed Section 3 of the
proposed zoning and subdivision ordinance, specifically violations
and penalties. Members reviewed Phil Robinson’s comments. Discussion
was held on the difference between infractions and misdemeanors, as
well as the enforcement process. Steve Tanner stated that imposing
an infraction denied those accused of a trial by jury, and
imposition of the administrative penalty would cloud title without
recourse or appeal. Steve Shelman concurred, and said he favored
keeping all violations as misdemeanors. Wilma Wallace said she liked
the proposal as written, as it gave those in violation ample
opportunity to correct a violation before legal action was taken.
After discussion, members concurred with the establishment of the
penalties as presented, noting that infractions for lesser
violations provided a more sure method for compelling adherence
without attaching a criminal penalty. Members concurred that
imposing jail time for misdemeanor planning violations was
unreasonable, so established that misdemeanors would be punishable
by fine only.
- Members reviewed and amended Sections
5.1 and
5.2 as annotated.
- The meeting adjourned at 8 p.m.
All progress will be posted on
the county website to allow the widest public participation, and
updates will continue to be sent by email to those in the
Ordinance
Development Community.
|